Skip to main content

Main navigation

Cheat sheet: Christopher Wylie

What don’t they want us to know? And other questions the Cambridge Analytica whistleblower has us asking about our personal data.

Susie Anderson Susie Anderson

Is it impossible to stay safe online? Can we still trust Facebook – or Google, or Instagram, or Snapchat? These are questions that have plagued us all. And not just technically and politically, but also philosophically.

In 2018, data scientist Christopher Wylie released a cache of documents revealing how Cambridge Analytica, his former employer, was involved in the illegal practice of harvesting data to target groups and influence political influence. This leak is part of the reason these questions have overtaken public debate.

For Wylie’s appearance at Antidote, we’ve put together a digital health check, a guide to some of the big questions about data, privacy, security and Facebook we should be asking ourselves – and the big tech companies – if we want to keep living our lives online.

How can I protect my data?

In the wake of all this information about our data and what tech companies are doing with it, there is a slow yet certain movement away from these platforms. Speaking at Byron Bay Writers Festival recently, former Greens Senator Scott Ludlam suggested that “data is the new oil”, that these technologies are political technologies, and that we need to catch up with appropriate legislature to protect ourselves. People are responding by leaving Facebook and the other major platforms in droves, seeking alternative modes of communication.

Can I see the data you have on me?

This is what digital media Professor David Carroll asked Cambridge Analytica after they bragged about having information on every voter following the 2016 US election. Carroll filed a Subject Access Request in 2017 – a law that allows EU citizens to file a request to obtain personal data held on them.

When the request was ignored, he sued Cambridge Analytica parent company SCL Elections for failing to comply with the request. While the fine of £15,000 was largely symbolic, it began crucial international conversations about the personal information that Facebook holds about individuals, from rights, ownership and access.

What don’t they want us to know?

This lack of transparency about what third party companies, advertisers or websites like Facebook and other social media sites are doing with our personal information has become a cause for international concern.

Shortly after Alexander Nix testified in British Court, Chris Wylie appeared on BBC 4 News in June 2018, implying that while Cambridge Analytica may have shut down, there are more companies like it lying in wait. He spoke on the drastic impact social media advertising is having an impact on our democracy: “Mark Zuckerberg doesn’t want to testify in British court because there’s something happening that he doesn’t want us to see.”

Find more about Talks & Ideas at the Opera House